Red Flags in Legal Bills: Incremental Billing Issues

[Note: This is the second in a series of posts on “red flags in legal bills.”  The posts are taken from my article “Red Flags in Legal Bills: What Warning Signals are Attorneys Sending?”]

My last post was on billing large blocks of time for long work days.  Now we go the other way and look at billing in very small increments of time. While the problems (i.e., costs) that can arise when billing for long work days can be easily understood, the problems associated with billing in small increments of time are more subtle and their impact on legal costs less understood and appreciated.

To begin with, most company litigation or billing guidelines require attorneys to bill in minimum increments of 0.1 hour.   These guidelines also allow attorneys to “round up” any task of over 3 minutes to 0.1 hour and that any task billed in excess of 0.1 (or 6 minutes) should be rounded up or down to the nearest higher or lower increment.  These requirements mirror an attorney’s ethical duty.  See ABA Formal Op. 93-379 (1993)(“A lawyer may not bill for more time than she actually spends on the matter, except to the extent that she rounds up to minimum time periods.”).


[ A full copy of this article is available exclusively to clients of or Legal Points, LLC.  If you are a client and would like to receive a copy of this article, please contact ]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s