[Editor’s note: this is another in a series of blog posts discussing how specific ABA Model Rules of Prof. Conduct that all lawyers must follow impacts how lawyers can and cannot bill clients.]
Rule 1.4(b) Communication provides that “[a] lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.”
In interpreting an attorney’s duty of “communication” pursuant to RPC 1.4, courts have held that an attorney has a mandatory ethical duty to “clearly explain” fees and costs to clients. See, e.g., Board of Prof. Resp., Wyoming State Bar v. Bruce S. Asay, WSB #5-1739, 2016 WY 47 (WY 2016)(court found that attorney violated rule 1.4 by failing to “clearly explain” to client the charges).
Providing a “clear explanation” has been interpreted to mean . . .
[A complete copy of this blog post is available to clients of LegalBillAudit.com. To obtain a copy, contact firstname.lastname@example.org.]